TheWrapReviews on record for thewrap.com

so varied. occasionally insightful but generally weird. strange set with presenters craning their necks to see oddly placed correspondent input. Guests with nothing to say. Moving cameras and opionated sky 'specialists'. Like Sky, I have moved on.

Way to much camera zooming and moving between guests and presenter. The background is out of focus and makes it hard for the viewer to see a clear image of the presenter and guests. A bad production of a once high class news show.

Why launch sky wrap? We still have the same old cronies on the panel filling their boots with loot!. Stupid name and same old boring negative news! Let's hear some positive stuff for a change!!!

This is an irritating mess!! The actual NEWS keeps being interrupted by opinions. Sky has extremely articulate reporters actually on location! Why listen to desk bound journalists n London who are not in Washington! Then they drone on about newspaper articles for TWO HOURS. Why keep moving the cameras side to side? Sky reporters are superb but this new format diminishes their work. Send Sarah Vine or Matthew Parris to a war zone then their opinions might be illuminating.Meanwhile, I will NOT EVER WATCH THE WRAP AGAIN!!!

Horrible website. Just when you try to read something, it keeps refreshing with a constant of session, a psychotic insatiable barrage of ads. Pathetic website that should be shut down. Horrible experience.

Forcing a reader to register and/or give you money to access an article is just going to get me to leave your site

not gonna subscribe to reed a few made-up extra nonsense lines.

The writers are awful. They have the grammar of a middle schooler and their articles are riddled with spelling error. I dont think one should trust a word a writer says if they write confidently as confidentially. Looking at you Phil Owen.